DVD 1 & 2 : Dublin - June 24th, 2005

U2videodrug description
DVD Authoring & multicam audio/video mix by Onno

- Handycam Video Sources -

1 - Hi8 Master [tripod] > PC > DVD [XP] : ilcontethefly - encoded by LAS [Complete]
2 - MiniDV Masters > PC > DVD [XP] : Chris M - encoded by Onno [Complete]
3 - MiniDV Masters > PC > DVD: Sweetthorn [1h20']
4 - MiniDV Master > DVD: Zargor [couple of songs]

- Digicam Video Sources -

Zigune // Zsuzsi // Hanta // Unknown

- Audio Sources -

AC3 5.1 Ch: Multichannel mix by Onno of WatchMoreTV, B!gGiRL source & AT933 > MZ-R700 source & SOUSOUS source (384 kb/sec)
DTS 5.1 Ch: Multichannel mix by Onno of WatchMoreTV, B!gGiRL source & AT933 > MZ-R700 source & SOUSOUS source (1.536 Mb/sec)

U2videodrug project comments
The recordings that are available from this concert are nice audience recordings, but never perfect. Sometimes a lot of clapping and screaming, but what
more can you expect from an audience recording! Despite this fact, it still sounds great. I made a matrix of the different recordings, but the B!gGirl
recording is the most prominent one (front channels). Sousous's recording fills up the rear channels. Sometimes there are gaps and i used the other
recording to fill up those gaps, as well as some of the original sound that was captured with the video because none of the audience recordings cover the
complete

U2videodrug description
The handycam sources are really good quality. Most of the time they are very stable as well. The digicam recordings are a nice addition to
this DVD, with some really great closup shots. The quality of the first dvd is the highest, because this one is only about 55 minutes long,
while the second disc is about 20 minutes longer. So therefore the bitrate of the second DVD is lower than the first. Sometimes this is visible
when looking at the Hi8 shots (Edge side). There you can also see the quality difference of digital camera's vs. analog camera's. But overall the
picture quality is good.